Three Stocks To Watch: BBBB FMCN DNAby Danny on July 6th, 2008 at 11:32:35 pm |
[[bbbb]] I would dump this thing below 37 and change, which is its multi-year support line.
[[FMCN]] looks like it will bounce at 26.20, strong support for the last few sessions and in times past, but whether it bounces or breaks, I’m gonna hop on. This will be good for a few points in either direction.
Weekly:
Daily
[[DNA]] has traded within this channel for nary three years. I don’t see why this time it will be any different.
Weekly
Daily
CELG made the video, but you wouldn’t know that because youtube sucks balls.
biotech looks good here.
July 7th, 2008 at 12:17:45 amBoone, you looking at DNA as a short?
July 7th, 2008 at 12:28:55 amcajun- youtube is gay.
shed- yup
July 7th, 2008 at 9:44:30 amDanny - I went to MCD for dinner tonight (unusual) but the interesting thing was they had all these flat panel TV’s everywhere so you could watch while eating. Cramer happened to be on one TV, and he confidently declared to a caller that DNA is going to a hundred! Another egregious Cramer top?
He does agree with Cajun that biotech is looking good. I think Cramer reads here, honestly.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:32:29 pm(DNA: 81.82 +0.81%) has traded within this channel for nary (sic) three years.
“Nearly?”
July 19th, 2008 at 1:22:01 pmno jake it’s a old seaman’s term
July 21st, 2008 at 3:21:02 pmI recognize “nary.”
If that’s what you mean, you’re using it incorrectly here. It means “not ever a one.”
_
July 21st, 2008 at 3:38:07 pmSo, I used it correctly. It hasn’t broken the channel in not ever a one three years. Sure it sounds labored, but hey, that’s old english.
July 21st, 2008 at 3:47:19 pm(DNA: 93.52 +14.30%) has traded within this channel for nary (sic) three years.
You don’t say anything about breaking the channel. You say it has traded within this channel for “not ever one” three years.
Hmmmm…
“Near on” or “nearly” is a lot better choice, methinks.
Not that I’m not a fan of ye Olde Englishisms, ye tossy squeaker.
July 21st, 2008 at 4:05:11 pmhaha cmon jake. it’s funny.
“Not that I’m not a fan of ye Olde Englishisms, ye tossy squeaker.”
See, that’s funny too.
Whether or not it’s correct, and yeah, I misused it, both still work for me.
July 21st, 2008 at 4:21:29 pmLanguage is important.
Even more important than accounting.
Ye poncy mincer.
___
July 21st, 2008 at 4:44:51 pmjake, you querulous bastard.
July 21st, 2008 at 4:52:27 pmDanny attempts to purchase some poultry at Jake’s Butcher Shoppe:
_
July 21st, 2008 at 5:11:19 pmin other news, I got short aapl at 159, and 156. I win.
but that was pretty good jake, you great pillock.
July 21st, 2008 at 5:55:12 pmNice Danny, I would hold at least half until $140, chart looks so fucked with nothing to prop it up in the near term.
July 21st, 2008 at 5:58:07 pmyeah, and I have that straddle, which is up, but only by about 450 (my guess).
I’m pretty happy, though in hindsight, aapl was clearly going down, I shouldnt have covered the original short at 174.
July 21st, 2008 at 6:41:26 pm