Greenspan’s Testimony is Unsatisfactoryby Green Writer on October 23rd, 2008 at 8:35 pm |
Derivatives and the gambling nature behind them have destroyed many institutions from the South Sea Company in the 1700’s to the S&L, OCAP, LTMC, to today’s sub prime debacle.
For Greenspan to say today that he and others did not have the intelligence, information, etc to predict such a crisis is absolutely absurd, erroneous, preposterous, and quite possibly the worst attempt to deceive Joe the plumber.
A 200 year old bank in England was put out of business in 6 months for derivatives irresponsibility.
The Fast Money desk and other news stations are describing this as an era of great ignorance.
Well first off, this is not ignorance, but a contrived scenario: “Under the Federal Reserve Act, Panics are scientifically created. The present panic is the first scientifically created one, worked out as we figure a mathematical equation.” Congressman Charles Lindbergh 1921 in response to the panic of 1920.
For Joe the plumber this is all you have to know: The SEC in 2002 allowed the banks to have more leverage. The average bank went from leverage of 10 to 1 to around 40 to 1. The insane like JPM & CÂ stepped it up to 74 to 1 and the stupid like AIG, FNM, and FRE took their leverage to over 100 to 1.
The second thing Joe the plumber needs to understand is that all markets have cycles. Cycles have peaks and valleys. To think the housing market would never go down is against all common sense and is the very first thing people like Greenspan and Wall st. learns in economics 101.
The third issue is that when interest rates go higher so will the ARMS, ALT~A, and other variable interest rate contracts. So as Greenspan began to hike interest rates, since they were artificially low after 911, he had to know this would eventually create massive financial burden upon no document low income sub prime loans.
This is probably why Greenspan and Bernanke only raised interest rates in quarter point increments. They knew from past bubbles that raising rates created problems. Was this not the whole idea of “irrational exuberance.” Raising rates was a way of slowing down speculation which eventually led to the popping of the dot com bubble.Â
Lastly, all of Wall st. and the government have been hiring physicists, mathematicians, and genius types for many years to develop and extrapolate formulas to create models of prediction. Surely some one of this vast group of people had the possible outcome of a housing led derivative bubble.
Sorry Greenspan you and many others are not coming clean.




(11 votes, average: 4.18 out of 5)






Great stuff Green Writer…also, Greenspan actually had a better way to deal with the dot com bubble than raising rates as the FED had FULL authority to raise margin requirements if it so desired.
October 23rd, 2008 at 9:31 pmtrue dat son….
October 23rd, 2008 at 9:57 pmGW,
At least we finally heard from the former Fed Res Ch, Sec of Treas and SEC Ch (all republicans … small r intended) that FNM, FRE and Obama were not the primary reasons for the sub-prime mortgage debacle (much to Jake’s chagrin). Greenspan even admitted that the free-market system that he believed in has failed and he doesn’t yet understand it.
Ever hear of Greed?
Asked by committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, whether his free-market convictions pushed him to make wrong decisions, especially his failure to rein in unsafe mortgage lending practices, Greenspan replied that indeed he had found a flaw in his ideology, one that left him very distressed.”In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology was not right?” Waxman asked.
“Absolutely, precisely,” replied Greenspan, who stepped down as Fed chief in 2006 after more than 18 years as chairman. “That’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I have been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence it was working exceptionally well.”
Sad … his ideology blown apart by I-bankers greedy enough to destroy themselves in the process and possibly the U S economy and Capitalism as we’ve known it.
Next bubble, gold in 1-2 years as a result of current activities …
October 23rd, 2008 at 11:02 pmSorry … that was me (above) … didn’t realize my name was left blank when I posted.
October 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 pmGood post and thoughtful Harper’s article by Janszen. Thanks. Seems like the choice now is between waiting things out or buying into the next bubble (alternative energy) right away (if you follow Janszen’s logic).
October 23rd, 2008 at 11:45 pmHenry Waxman is the Phantom of the Opera.
Or the devil, whichever.
______
October 23rd, 2008 at 11:56 pmDat be true young boss, dat be true…
I remember when my Datek account had some voodoo vexing math which let me trade something like $65,000 with a $8,000 balance around that time.
I never did understand the margin formula, but it was AFTER the dot-com bubble burst!
October 24th, 2008 at 3:56 am